Monday, December 30, 2024

Immigration visas

The controversy about immigration visas has generated a lot of confusion.

This post is helpful:


The reason H1B Visa debate spun out into a fight goes deeper than the H1B issue. For many this issue became the vehicle for their resentment about a few big issues but they failed to see how Elon shares their anger: • How Whites have been discriminated against in corporate America for many years, largely due to DEI. In the year after George Floyd, only 6% of new S&P 100 jobs went to White people despite Whites making up a majority of the race looking to get a job. According to Bloomberg, 94% of the 323,570 new jobs went to "people of color". What occurred over the past 4 years was just blatant racism against Whites and I say this as a Latino. • The feeling that the immigration rug always gets pulled out from under us. For decades now the establishment has found some way to stop the deportation of illegal immigrants. Even the first time we elected Trump they kneecapped his ability to build a full wall and deport millions of illegals. Many who have been denied opportunities, job interviews and promotions over DEI are rightfully angry. On top of that they know a fight is coming on illegal immigration where the left and RINO’s will try to keep all of the illegals here. So when H1B popped up, too many attached their anger about these 2 issues in how they approached the H1B debate with an ally. Keep in mind, Elon invested $44B in giving us a voice online again. He put his neck out for our movement in ways that many don’t even understand. If Trump lost, Elon faced possible jail and the loss of everything he’s ever built as an example for others like him to never cross the left. Fresh off that risk, instead of a healthy debate he became the punching bag for resentments many have but they took it out on the wrong person. A debate is good and there are serious problems within H1B that need to be fixed. Guess what though? Elon agrees that there are issues that need fixing. Some key realizations that can get people past this and take us to a productive end: • Elon agrees that DEI is racism. He agrees that what was done due to racist DEI policies was contemptible and must be corrected. He agrees that we must deport illegal immigrants. He put his money and career on the line to prove that. That’s worthy of recognition and at least the assumption of good intent. These very real issues don’t mean we should shoot ourselves in the foot by never trying to poach foreign talent. And to be clear, I’m not saying that is everyone’s position who opposes H1B but I’ve seen some saying that we shouldn’t allow ANYONE and that’s just shortsighted. When we allow our enemies to steal geniuses, we get weaker as a result. 2 races will decide who the global superpower is for the next 100 years: 1. Who wins the AI race And 2. Who wins the space race We would be foolish to not steal every genius we can from our competition. We stand to lose more than you can imagine if we lose those races. I understand the argument about O-1 vs H1B on this subject but depending on reforms, we need some version of both or a new Visa entirely to ensure that we poach the very best talent while protecting the wages of American workers, prioritizing American workers and further educating our future American workforce. All that to say, a good deal CAN be had but it’s going to come from working together and giving credit to the sacrifices we’ve all made to get to this point where our guy is the President for the next 4 years. We can’t let perfect become the enemy of good. If we can improve our country 90%, it’s worth it if the other option is hurting it because nothing gets done due to infighting. Let this be a bump in the road, not a fracture in it that makes it an unusable road. Everyone calling out the misuse of H1B respectfully has done a great job and I think it will have an impact on the final outcome in terms of how H1B is reformed. This kind of debate is good and what makes X special. Remember how we got here… Together. Okay now you can yell at me. 😂

Views 



Saturday, December 28, 2024

Milton Friedman thread

 

All good stuff here:

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1872855650394619946




The left today embraces MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) so they can print the dollar into oblivion, as long as it doesn't cause inflation -- the problem is they ignored that "it caused inflation" -- and they ignored it. MMT is embrace by Socialists since it's all about the expansion of govt. control. Milton Friedman and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) represent two fundamentally different approaches to economics, particularly in terms of monetary policy, fiscal policy, and the role of government in the economy. Here's a breakdown of how they differ: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT): Government Spending: MMT suggests that a country that issues its own fiat currency can never "run out of money" in the same way a household can; thus, it can spend freely on public goods to achieve full employment, as long as it doesn't cause inflation. Deficits and Debt: MMT proponents argue that deficits are not inherently problematic if they're used to fund productive activities or if they don't exceed the economy's ability to absorb the spending without causing inflation. Government debt in a currency-issuing country is seen more as a policy tool than a financial constraint. Inflation Control: Instead of focusing on controlling the money supply to manage inflation, MMT advocates for managing inflation through other means like tax policy, price controls, or adjusting public spending based on economic capacity. Job Guarantee: A central tenet of MMT is the proposal for a federal job guarantee program to achieve full employment, which contrasts with Friedman's preference for market solutions to unemployment. MMT is very similar to Socialism --- this is why they embrace MMT. Similarities with Socialism: State Intervention: MMT advocates for significant government intervention in the economy, particularly through fiscal policy to achieve goals like full employment or public investment. This aligns with socialist ideas of using state power to manage economic outcomes for social benefit. Public Spending: The emphasis on government spending to fund public services, infrastructure, and social programs (like a job guarantee) might resonate with socialist ideals of state provision for public welfare. Reducing Unemployment: MMT's focus on full employment through direct job creation by the government can be seen as a form of social welfare, which is a common goal in socialist policies. Redistribution: By advocating for policies that could lead to wealth redistribution (through taxes to control inflation or fund public programs), MMT touches on socialist principles of reducing economic disparities.



Friday, December 27, 2024

20-point plan

 

Insurrection Barbie
Here is Trump’s 20 point plan to make America Great Again. If you remove the partisan brainwashing, please tell me how this is not what is in the best interests for America. 1. Seal the border and stop illegal migrant invasion. 2. Carry out the largest deportation operation in American history.   3. End inflation, and make America affordable again. 4. Make America the dominant energy producer in the world. 5. Stop outsourcing our manufacturing and make the United States a manufacturing superpower again.  6. Large tax cuts for workers, and no tax on tips. 7. Defend our constitution, our bill of rights, and our fundamental freedoms, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to keep and bear arms. 8. Prevent world war three, restore peace in Europe and in the middle east, and build a great iron dome missile defense shield over our entire country -- all made in America. 9. End the weaponization of government against the American people. 10. Stop the migrant crime epidemic, demolish the foreign drug cartels, crush gang violence, and lock up violent offenders. 11. Rebuild our cities, including Washington dc, making them safe, clean, and beautiful again.  12. Strengthen and modernize our military, making it, without question, the strongest and most powerful in the world. 13. Keep the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency. 14. Fight for and protect social security and Medicare with no cuts, including no changes to the retirement age. 15. Cancel the electric vehicle mandate and cut costly and burdensome regulations.  16. Cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, radical gender ideology, and other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content on our children.   17. Keep men out of women's sports.   18. Deport pro-Hamas radicals and make our college campuses safe and patriotic again.   19. Secure our elections, including same day voting, voter identification, paper ballots, and proof of citizenship.   20. Unite our country by bringing it to new and record levels of success. Like which one of those 20 things trip you up which one of them do you think would be bad for America?

Defunding NGOs

Makes sense.

https://truthovernews.org/p/defunding-the-ngos

Defunding the NGOs

At their core, NGOs are an off-the-books form of shadow government.

We’ve railed against the use of NGOs (non-governmental organizations) for years so it's gratifying to see that these NGOs are finally getting the attention that they deserve. At their core, NGOs are nothing more than an off-the-books form of shadow government. They exist primarily to enact policies that our out-of-control federal agencies want to establish, but are legally prohibited from doing so.

NGOs have been used to push a variety of State Department agendas in foreign countries and they’ve been at the forefront of government-directed censorship that has plagued our country - and effectively killed free speech in the UK and European Union. In other words, NGO's are a government-funded extension that act as effectuators of unofficial government policy - put in place to promote agendas that our federal agencies are unable to implement directly.

NGOs are both a vast grift and a total corruption of our Constitution.

Although there’s a dawning public realization, many people are still unaware that large amounts of federal funds are being given to a wide variety of NGOs, many of them UN-related. Fewer still are aware of just how large these amounts are - and what purposes they are being used for.

In one particularly nefarious example, taxpayer money was used to facilitate the flood of illegals into our country. Some of this money comes from the funding that we are paying to the United Nations - $4.1 billion slated for 2024 - up from $3.4 billion in 2023. But there’s another even larger element to the UN Funding that often goes unreported.

The US also provides voluntary contributions to UN-related entities through accounts tied to the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and other related programs. Congress generally appropriates overall funding to these accounts, but it’s the executive branch that determines how these unmarked funds are actually allocated.

For example, according to USAID reports, the United States contributed more than $7.4 billion to U.N. entities through global humanitarian accounts in FY2022, including Migration and Refugee Assistance, International Disaster Assistance, and Food for Peace - an amount that’s more than double the official UN contributions for that same year.

In other words, in addition to the generalized funding that we already provide to the UN, Biden’s State Department has been providing enormous amounts of additional funding to the UN - and as we’ll see, this hidden funding was used to establish the hundreds of NGOs that set up way-stations all along the routes from Latin America into the US.

As the Heritage Foundation's Mike Howell noted, these NGOs were also “involved in lobbying the Biden administration and our Congress to keep the border wide open… they're involved in D.C. making sure the border stays open through policy and support to the Biden administration. A lot of their staffers and people connected in those NGO networks are in the Biden administration.”

If there’s doubt regarding the role of NGOs as an unofficial extension of our government, consider that in addition to the funding by our government, the actions by the NGOs paralleled Biden's executive orders on the border that were issued on day one and continued throughout the first month of his administration.

Biden’s EOs allowed the border to be thrown wide open, deportation rules halted and created an exemption of legal penalties for those who violated our immigration laws. Simultaneously the State Department and USAID established internal funding for the NGOs that had begun driving the flow of illegal immigrants into our country.

None of this was organic. This point cannot be emphasized enough. The flood of illegals was not something that happened spontaneously and without planning. Everything was designed, constructed and paid for by our government, primarily using NGOs as off-the-book governmental vehicles to do so.

It had long been suspected that the State Department was directly facilitating illegal immigration into the United States - using the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration or PRM to do so. According to their website, PRM’s mission is to “provide protection, ease suffering, and resolve the plight of persecuted and uprooted people around the world on behalf of the American people by working with other governments and international partners.”

Despite their noble-sounding mission, PRM goes to some lengths to hide where their funding is actually going and what it's really being used for. But a January 2024 report from Todd Bensman at the Center for Immigration Studies began to shine some light on the financial activities of PRM. In that report, Bensman highlighted how the United Nations was providing funding for US bound migrants in 2024.

The amounts being spent by the UN were enormous - including nearly $1.6 billion in cash debit cards, food, clothing, medical treatment, shelter, and even “humanitarian transportation” during 2024 to millions of U.S.-bound immigrants in 17 Latin American nations and Mexico.

As Bensman notes, “The document makes clear in writing that the UN and these partners know their endeavor aids, abets, and makes possible the “onward movement” of immigrants who intend to illegally cross borders, especially to get into the United States.”

But it was the UN’s use of the NGO’s and related organizations that got Bensman to investigate further. What he found was shocking.

The State Department’s PRM division, along with USAID (run by former Obama UN Ambassador Samantha Power), had given the UN’s International Organization of Migration “more than $1.4 billion in just the last 12 months, by far the most on record. PRM was also the biggest donor to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, which is among 15 different UN agencies that will spread money and aid all along the migrant trails of Latin America.”

As Bensman observed, “I have visited UN waystations featuring long lines of U.S.-bound immigrants applying for aid from clipboard-wielding workers handing out cash cards and other goodies, from Reynosa and Monterrey in the north of Mexico to Tapachula in the far south. But the waystations also appear everywhere along the trails much farther south.”

According to the 2023 fiscal year Congressional presentation from the State Department’s PRM, “U.S. contributions… helped the Mexican Commission for Refugee Assistance increase its asylum registration and processing capacity by 400 percent.” As their presentation notes, “In Central America and Mexico, PRM support helps government officials and civil society to identify, screen, protect, and assist vulnerable migrants and to strengthen national asylum systems and other protection capacities.“

Notice what’s really being disclosed in PRM’s congressional presentation. In addition to providing humanitarian aid for existing streams of migrants, the underlying infrastructure to create these enormous streams of refugees was being directly funded by PRM.

In reality, all of this is being funded by you. Taxpayer money is being spent - more or less anonymously - by the US State Department to help facilitate the unprecedented stream of illegal immigrants that have been flooding across our borders and throughout the entire US.

When we first discovered that it was our own State Department that was funding the flow of illegals into our country we had a hard time accepting what we were seeing. A complete and total betrayal by our State Department - using our own tax dollars against us.

But the more we dug, the worse that it got. We uncovered massive and ongoing donations (bottom of page) from several FEMA programs to a variety of NGOs - including large amounts that were sent repetitively to Catholic Charities of America.

The amounts designated by FEMA under just one program for illegals (between the years 2024 and 2023) were huge: $650 million and $364 million respectively. Drop down on FEMA’s Shelter and Services Program page to “Annual Funding” in order to see the amounts we’re referencing.

Another section where we found large amounts of funding for illegals is under FEMA’s “Emergency Food and Shelter Program (EFSP)” program that likely receives additional funding support from other sources. The discovery of Catholic Charities as a primary recipient of FEMA funding was not an anomaly.

As it turns out, many of the NGOs that are recipients of taxpayer-funded money from the State Department are actually faith-based non-profit organizations. As Bensman notes, “The UN has entrusted faith-based establishment NGOs with handling a lot of the $372 million in “Cash and Voucher Assistance” and “Multipurpose Cash Assistance”.

Indeed, a follow-up “examination of the more than 30 faith-based nonprofits among those UN NGO partners - representing Jewish, Lutheran, Seventh Day Adventist, Catholic [particularly the Jesuits], and nondenominational evangelical organizations - shows that the U.S. State Department’s PRM and USAID have been mainlining taxpayer funds to these groups.”

According to The Heritage Foundation's Mike Howell, “Catholic charities are… the 800 pound gorilla when it comes to this. They are deeply involved in facilitating the travel of illegal aliens throughout the country.”

To add insult to injury there was another potential source of unexpected funding for these same NGOs. This new funding source was working its way through Congress in early 2024 in the form of additional funding for Ukraine that was disguised as a “Republican-led” Border Bill.

The “Trojan Horse” Border Bill that was introduced by Republican Senator James Lankford and Democrat Senator Chris Murphy (designed in conjunction with the Biden White House) included a shocking $2.6 billion for “refugee and entrant assistance activities”. Additionally there were two other provisions - one in the amount of $5.6 billion and the other in the amount of $3.5 billion - that were designated as “International Disaster Assistance” and “Migration and Refugee Assistance” respectively.

This carefully hidden funding lurking within Lankford’s Border Bill was intended to go directly to the same NGOs that were responsible for the flood of illegals into our country. As America first Legal observed, the proposed bill was even worse than the current laws. Fortunately the Border Bill ultimately failed - although its failure was used as a political attack on Trump during the election.

The hard truth is that we are the ones who have been paying for the flow of illegals through massive federal subsidization of the hundreds of NGOs that set up waystations throughout all of Latin America. And this represents only a single subset of activities where our government employs the NGO model. As we mentioned at the outset, the active censorship of Americans has its roots in a variety of government-directed NGOs, nonprofits and universities.

It’s long-past time to bring an end to our government’s funding of NGOs as a means to avoid the carefully-designed constraints of our Constitution. It’s time to make our government accountable for their actions. The new Trump Administration cannot start soon enough. 



Your Discomfort Means It's Working

  https://quoththeraven.substack.com/p/your-discomfort-means-its-working Your Discomfort Means It's Working This tariff sea change rever...