Sunday, October 4, 2026

France and El Salvador

France is ready?




Translated from French
I think France is speedrunning the game. And I think it's ready to wrap it up. Today, I'm going to explain how Bukele pulled it off in El Salvador. At first, people were skeptical. You have to understand where this country was starting from. In 2015, El Salvador is the murder capital of the world: over 100 homicides per 100,000 people. A country of 6 million people held hostage by two gangs, MS-13 and Barrio 18, with tens of thousands of members. They control entire neighborhoods. You cross the wrong invisible border between two territories, you die. Every business pays the "renta." Bus drivers who refuse to pay are executed at the wheel, right in front of the passengers. In 2010 in Mejicanos, gang members douse a bus with gasoline and set it on fire with the people locked inside. Kids recruited at 12 years old. Teens killed because they refused to join a gang. Entire families fleeing to the United States because staying means burying their children. Bukele comes to power in 2019. In March 2022, the gangs put on a show of strength: 62 murders in a single day, 87 in one weekend. His response comes the next day: state of emergency. And he's never lifted it. The army and police move into neighborhoods the state had abandoned for 20 years. Entire cities are cordoned off and searched house by house. Over 80,000 arrests. A gang tattoo is enough. In just a few months, he builds CECOT, a mega-prison with 40,000 spots. The leaders are isolated, communications cut off, no more orders coming out of the cells. Sentences for mere gang affiliation skyrocket. NGOs scream bloody murder. The international press calls him a dictator. He puts "the coolest dictator in the world" in his bio and keeps going. Result: the homicide rate drops below 2 per 100,000. Less than the United States. The most dangerous country in the world becomes one of the safest on the continent in three years. And the people have spoken. Reelected in 2024 with about 85% of the vote, popularity around 90%. Today, people go out at night, the terraces are packed, surfers are pouring in from all over the world, tourism is booming, the diaspora is coming back. El Salvador has become a little paradise. Me, I'm very optimistic about France. We have the best culture in the world. The best infrastructure. The most beautiful landscapes. An education system that just needs a refresh. And we have huge intelligence, especially in our elites. They just need to stop being leftists. But that'll come. France is ready.


https://x.com/brivael/status/2106433925547733053?s=20


Translated from French
Every time I talk about insecurity, I get the same response: "It's impossible in France. Too complicated. Too late." That's wrong. El Salvador did it. Colombia did it. Countries that started from much further behind than we did. So here, concretely, is what I would do if I were in power. First, we align the parents. A minor who breaks, loots, burns a car or a school—he has parents. Today, those parents face no consequences. Tomorrow, that changes, immediately: loss of social housing, suspension of benefits, end of aid. Not in six months, not after ten years of proceedings. Right away. The goal is simple: so every family understands that their kid can no longer, by design, cause chaos without the whole family paying the price. Responsibility goes back home. Next, for those who keep going: prison. For real. Heavy mandatory minimum sentences, enforced, without automatic adjustments. End to repeated stays of execution and the fifteenth summons to the law. And we build the necessary cells. Bukele built a 40,000-place prison in a few months. We know how to put on the Olympics in seven years; we know how to build prisons. Third, justice. A law is worthless if it's not enforced. Today, part of the judiciary is in suicidal empathy: it sees the delinquent as a victim and the victim as collateral damage. Activist judges, red judges, those who judge with their ideology rather than the law, must be inspected and removed when necessary. And there's a very simple way to align the whole system: accountability. If a judge releases a dangerous person and that individual commits another serious act, that judge answers for it, up to dismissal. A surgeon answers for his errors. A pilot answers for his errors. Why not the one who decides to put a dangerous individual back on the street? A judge's job is to protect victims and society. Not to offer a fifth, sixth, seventh chance at reintegration to people who keep reoffending again and again. Fourth, the lost territories of the Republic. The looting, the riots, the everyday violence—it's all backed by an economy: the drug trade. Dealing finances, recruits, protects, terrorizes. As long as we don't break the networks, we're bailing the sea with a teaspoon. So we declare a local state of emergency in each of those zones. The military in support of the police. Block by block, we dislodge the dealers and the ringleaders, one by one. The maps already exist; the police and intelligence know exactly where the dealing points are and who runs them. The leaders are totally isolated—no orders come out of the cells anymore. What's missing isn't information. It's will. Fifth, a clear contract with immigration. France welcomes. But welcoming is a contract, not an entitlement. In exchange: respect for our laws, our language, our culture. A convicted foreigner is expelled. The slightest deviation is no longer tolerated. It's not up to French victims to pay for the second chance of those who spat on the first. And finally, we measure everything. Last time, I made a dashboard of public spending. We'll do exactly the same for insecurity. I'd call it Zero Line: a public platform that tracks in real time every offense, every crime, every assault, every demonstration that turns violent, every recidivism, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city. We need to see the curves go down. As long as they don't, as long as we're not at near-zero levels, we keep going. We reason from first principles: where does insecurity come from, what produces it, how do we cut it off at the root. We measure, we act, we iterate. Like a tech company that doesn't let go of a bug until it's fixed. It's not a question of resources. It's not a question of feasibility. It's a question of will. France is ready.





ecology through abundance, not deprivation: Elon Musk

 



Brivael Le Pogam
Translated from French
Yesterday, I was on a podcast and someone said something that really struck me: basically, people don't understand Elon Musk. Neither him, nor his project. In this post, I'm going to try to explain it. First off, why I'm so interested in him. As an entrepreneur, I think you have to draw inspiration from the best. And today, the best entrepreneur in the world is Elon Musk. So I consume every bit of content I can find on him: interviews, podcasts, conferences, biographies. And I learn infinitely more than by listening to a business school prof who's never started a company in their life. First piece of advice, then: if you want to get good at entrepreneurship, listen to Elon Musk and try to understand how he operates. And to understand how he operates, you have to grasp his psychology. Because the guy's got a depth that few people suspect. It all stems from an existential crisis he went through as a teen. He wonders what the meaning of life is. He devours every philosophy he can, especially the German philosophers, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer. He says it himself with a laugh: don't read German philosophers when you're a teen, it won't make you any happier. What pulls him out of it is Douglas Adams' *The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy*. The idea that often, the hardest part isn't finding the answer, but knowing what question to ask. And he draws a conclusion from it that will guide his entire life: the only project that truly makes sense is to expand consciousness. To grow, explore, understand. For himself and for all of humanity. Everything else flows from that. On one side, there's Earth. Solving concrete problems, here and now. That's Tesla, batteries, solar energy, autonomous driving. And that's where he had an intuition that many still haven't grasped: the real ecological transition can't rely on resentment, guilt, and degrowth. People want to keep living better, consuming, progressing. We won't stop progress. So instead of asking people to give things up, he builds better products that make the sustainable option more desirable than the old one. It's ecology through abundance, not deprivation. On the other side, there's the cosmos. That's SpaceX. Making humanity a multiplanetary species. Not just as a life insurance policy for civilization, but as a driver. Opening up space could potentially multiply the economy by 10 in the next 10 to 15 years. And above all, it's about giving humanity a purpose again. A frontier. A collective adventure: to discover and understand the universe. These two projects are deeply humanistic. Pro-human. They start from the premise that humanity isn't a problem to manage, but an adventure to pursue. And I think that's what's missing most in our era. A horizon. Something that lets us raise our kids with a shared purpose: to understand the universe, build, explore, live incredible experiences. And have fun doing it. When you look at Elon from this angle, everything falls into place. He's not a billionaire collecting companies. He's a guy who found his answer to the existential crisis of his teenage years, and decided to dedicate his life to it. And that's maybe the greatest entrepreneurship lesson there is: find a project big enough to give meaning to your life. The rest follows.

https://x.com/brivael/status/2106335011712442811?s=20


Fertility crisis: money vs biology/psychology

 


It's not about the money. Money has an effect, yes, but it's a part of something bigger. Women are genetically programmed to mate up. Not down. And not even across. Up. If she doesn't regard a man as superior to her, she generally doesn't want to have his babies. What this means is that there is an extremely simple control dial on fertility. More male power and status = more babies. More female power and status = less babies. Yes, it really is that simple. Why? Because every species has a mating ritual, and can only breed if they can carry it out. That's why you can breed rats and chickens in cages, but not pandas. Different mating ritual. And a critical element of the human mating ritual is "male impresses female". Not charms. Not bribes. Definitely not respects. Impresses. So, if you take power, wealth, and status away from men, and give it to women, you are just plain reaching for the controls and turning down the fertility dial. If you let men keep power, wealth and status — you don't have to give it to them because they're the ones who create it — fertility goes up. The fertility crisis is really the equality crisis. This idea might horrify you. You might have been taught all your life that everyone is equal, or must be, and anything else is unfair. Well, have you looked around you at universe? Unfairness is baked into the life cycle of every living organism, not mention the food chain. Evolutionary processes don't care about fairness. They care what works. Perhaps someday, we will be able to code DNA as easily as we code C++, and can decide what we want our instincts to be. But until that day, we are faced with a choice. 1. Stop using the political, legal, and mass media processes to force female equality, if not outright female supremacy, on the first world. Or 2. Die out and be replaced by third world retards, who will stay on this planet fighting wars with increasingly rusty AK47s and then spears, until the next asteroid comes along.


If a productive middle class family wants to have a child, they need to have good insurance and budget out like $8,000. If welfare dregs want to have a child, they just show up to the hospital and have it paid for by the productive middle class family. Societies die this way.


Funny enough my wife and I were just talking about this. Poor people are incentivized to have kids, they get EIC, WIC, SNAP, TANF, Insurance, etc, and more of each for every child they have, the rest of us pay for all this out of pocket. Having more kids is to expensive unless you are poor.



My mom retired from Dallas ISD in the ghetto teaching illegals and anchor babies English for over 30 years, while paying into Medicare. She went to the hospital for the first time in several years for a UTI in her 80’s and was found to have an MRI showing dementia. She fell behind and didn’t apply for Medicare part B. She was there two nights and not in ICU. Her teacher retirement plan (primary plan) punished her for this by refusing to pay for her hospital bill and therefore Medicare A was not billed for the remainder and they sent her a bill for 27k. All those years working for low pay to educate illegal invaders and then even in your old age you are denied and asked to pay for them again. The hospital suffers and hospital employees like myself don’t get raises or needed equipment, but she is on a fixed income and doesn’t not have the money. The illegal gets it all for free! They thank us by flying their foreign flags. πŸ’”


Training world leaders

  Open Minded Approach @OMApproach You still think the world ISN'T run from one center? Kim Jong Un, ruler of the most "isolated...