Something historic is happening across the West, and the legacy press can't see it, because the press is part of what is collapsing.
Peoples who were told for forty years that they had nothing in common are converging. Americans, French, Italians, Danes, British, Dutch. Different languages, different histories, and the same conclusion reached at the same time. They have all seen the same thing at work in their own countries: what the French call islamo-gauchisme, the alliance between the radical left and political Islam. And they are all saying no.
To understand why their hegemony is close to total collapse, you have to use their own concept. "Hegemony" comes from Antonio Gramsci, the Italian Marxist who understood that power doesn't rest on force. It rests on consent, on people accepting a worldview as obvious, as the only respectable one. That's why the left spent fifty years on what one German activist called the long march through the institutions. Universities, newsrooms, publishing houses, cultural ministries. Own the narrative and you own the country.
But hegemony has a weakness Gramsci himself understood. It dies the moment consent dies. And consent is dying everywhere at once.
They are losing the media war. In the 1970s, around 70% of Americans trusted the mass media. Today it's less than a third. In France, the gap between what the TV news says and what people see on their own street has become a joke. The gatekeepers lost the gate. An engineer with a phone can now reach more people than an evening news broadcast. The monopoly on the narrative, the foundation of the whole edifice, is gone.
And reality is finishing the job. Look at France. A movement that started in high schools ended on October 17 with city halls stormed, Limoges city hall burning and looting across Marseille, while the radical left blamed the police. The French saw it with their own eyes, without a filter. Today's polls show the radical left's candidate losing a presidential runoff by roughly two to one. You can deconstruct a text. You can't deconstruct a burning city hall.
Then comes the blow they can never recover from: abundance.
Collectivism has always been a politics of scarcity. Its whole logic is that the pie is fixed, so someone's gain is someone else's theft, so the state must take and redistribute, ration and control. That's why its latest form is degrowth. Planners need scarcity the way fire needs oxygen.
What is being built right now makes that logic obsolete. AI is collapsing the cost of intelligence. Robotics is about to collapse the cost of labor. Reusable rockets have already slashed the cost of reaching space. Elon Musk and thousands of builders like him are proving every day that the pie is not fixed. It can grow faster than anyone imagined. In a world of abundance, envy loses its grip and the planner loses his excuse. And AI does one more thing: it ends opacity. When any citizen can trace public money in minutes, the networks that live in the dark have nowhere left to hide.
So what comes next? Two things, in this order.
First, the reckoning, and this is where we have to be better than them. There will be no purges and no lists, and nobody will be prosecuted for having been wrong. Being wrong is not a crime, and we will never become what we fought. But aggravated corruption is a crime. Public money diverted to networks, fraud, abuse of office: those must be investigated, proven and judged one by one, by independent courts, with evidence, due process and the presumption of innocence. We don't jail people for their ideas. We jail people for stealing. That difference is the whole difference between a free civilization and the regimes we oppose.
Second, the reunification of the West. That doesn't mean another supranational empire run by unelected officials, which is the model that failed. It means a West of strong, sovereign nations that choose to work together. Agreements between countries that control their borders, produce their own energy, build their own AI and defend themselves, and that trade and cooperate as equals because they share the same foundations: the free individual, the rule of law, the right to build.
Gramsci's heirs spent fifty years winning the institutions. They are losing them in five, because they forgot that hegemony only lasts as long as reality cooperates.
Reality has stopped cooperating. Now it's our turn to build.
_____
I don't think you realize how lucky we are to have an Elon Musk at this level, actually fighting this thing.
Because let's be clear about the sides.
On one side, the people. The vast majority. Common sense, hard work, family, and one simple wish: to live in peace.
On the other, an illegitimate elite. Mostly globalist, which at its core is a communist project: managing humanity from the top, like a system. And since that project doesn't work (it has never worked anywhere), they survive in only one way: lies.
To hold on, this elite built systems of coercion and corruption. Ukraine is one of them. They've also captured and corrupted a huge share of the institutions that were supposed to protect us.
Take Bill Gates. On this line for years. It's no accident he ended up at the heart of Covid policy. Just ask yourself: why is a software billionaire talking directly to Fauci before the vaccine rollout even starts, as if he were part of the operation?
These people see humanity as a herd to be administered. But they're terrible at economics. They don't understand their model can't work. So instead of saying "we were wrong, let's change," they lie. They double down. And that's exactly what makes them dangerous.
Honestly, this system was almost impossible to break.
And then, by the most improbable of chances, there's one man. The richest man in the world. Who chose the side of the people against these illegitimate, mostly left-wing elites. And who's throwing all his power into this fight.
The system is dying. And he's the one pushing.
Think for two seconds. If Elon wanted to enslave humanity, he could have done it long ago. All he had to do was make a deal with the globalists. He'd have everything he wants, right now.
He did the opposite.
That should tell you whose side he's on.
https://x.com/brivael/status/2113968954892763233?s=20
_____
You don't understand anything happening in the US right now unless you read Elon Musk all the way through.
When he says that by 2036 money won't matter anymore, most people hear a billionaire's provocation. I hear something else.
Money is the fuel of every corruption system. Earmarked subsidies, public contracts negotiated behind closed doors, lobbies, front NGOs, regulatory rents. The day AI and robots produce more than humanity can consume, that lever disappears. And everyone who lives off that lever disappears with it.
There are a lot of them. And they've understood perfectly.
That's why we're now reading that Musk is preparing for "war" if Democrats take back Congress. He's not the one declaring war. It's an entire system that knows it's fighting for its survival.
Because we're at a turning point in human history. And there are only two ways out.
Either the Democrats win, and we enter 1984. A hyper-class that controls the AI models, the robot fleets, the data, the currency, and owns 99% of everything. Below them, the rest of humanity on life support, dependent on an income that can be granted and taken away. Klaus Schwab's Davos Forum summed up this world in one sentence: "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy." It's communism, except instead of promising equality, it embraces caste. And for the first time in history, a caste won't need the consent of the people to hold power: robots will do the policing, AI will do the surveillance.
Or we build a new order founded on merit, freedom, and private property. Where everyone remains the owner of their life, their work, and their share of the abundance. Where the collective ambition isn't managing scarcity, but understanding the universe and colonizing the cosmos. That's Elon Musk's project.
The technology is the same in both cases. What changes is who owns it.
Choose carefully which world you want to live in. And beware of socialists who promise to share the pie: they always end up keeping the knife.
https://x.com/brivael/status/2114008788101390455?s=20
_____
Elon Musk often says there's a good chance we're living in a simulation.
Let's take that seriously for a second.
If we're in a simulation, it isn't absurd to think everyone arrives with a role: a mission, a trajectory, something to accomplish. What our education system does is erase that role. It takes curious, unique children and turns them into NPCs, characters who recite their scripted lines, never ask questions, and follow the script.
But if everyone has a role, some roles carry more weight than others. Some characters serve the lie. Others come to break it.
For 30, 40, 50 years, we've lived in a world built on lies. Everyone knows it. Corruption sits on every floor, and institutional lying is accepted as normal. It isn't even an accident anymore. It's the system itself. Experts know and stay silent. Media know and cover it up. Officials know and sign anyway.
Then a player showed up with a quest: restore truth to the system.
In Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand imagines John Galt, the man who stops the motor of the world. He pulls the creators out of a system that lives off their work while despising them, and he lets it collapse under the weight of its own lies.
Musk goes further than Galt. He doesn't just stop the motor of the old world. He builds a new one.
SpaceX takes access to space away from governments and bureaucracies. Tesla rebuilds energy and transportation outside the cartels. X gives speech back to the people it was taken from. Each company is a brick in a parallel system built on a single rule: reality. A rocket can't lie. A battery can't lie. An open algorithm can't lie.
That's what terrifies the other side. A lie only survives as long as there's no alternative. The moment another system works in plain sight, the old one becomes indefensible.
Covid was the turning point. Before it, most people were asleep. Then they saw what was imposed on them, what was hidden from them, and how anyone who asked questions was treated. They woke up, and people who wake up don't go back to sleep.
History will judge this era. I think it will look at the architects of this system of lies the way we now look at collaborators.
So I'm speaking directly to the people on the inside. The ones who know, the ones who've seen, the ones who lie every day knowing they're lying.
From a purely rational standpoint, if I were in your shoes today, I'd ask myself one question: how do I cross over?
The answer is simple. You speak. You say: "I was inside a system I no longer believed in, and today I'm telling the truth." You publish what you saw. You name what you kept quiet.
It isn't too late, but the window is closing.
In this simulation, everyone can still choose their role. Choose the right one while there's still time.
https://x.com/brivael/status/2114003119134687559?s=20
No comments:
Post a Comment