The law schools started training ideologues around 20 years ago.
Riddle me this. Four major Big Law firms are counted on the side that thinks men have a legal right to play in women's sports.
There are zero major firms on the other side. Some good boutiques, no doubt, but oddly these small firms are even representing multiple amici in the case filing separate briefs (a weird thing before SCOTUS). Not a single Big Law firm to be found to represent these amici seeking to weigh in on an issue that is 80/20 in the normal world.
Think about that.
That's because BigLaw are the legal foot soldiers in the plot to destroy the USA.
Remember--BigLaw was falling all over itself 20 years ago to represent al Qaeda terrorists detained at Gitmo as pro bono clients.
But not a single J6 protestor got BigLaw pro bono representation.
Hearing from a few friends about how bad Big Law is in terms of bitterly clinging to the most radical and harm-inducing woke approaches WITHIN firms. It also plays out in what they choose to put their powerful resources behind.
It's pretty much the same way on voting issues. Many of the big hot shot white shoe firms do pro bono or highly discounted work for lefty groups that sue states to strike down pretty much any election integrity protection they pass.
We have a serious, structural problem in this country that every elected Republican has failed to do anything about. We have ideologues embedded in Article III courts.
For nearly 250 years, American jurisprudence has survived because the judiciary was designed to be restrained, principled, and institutional rather than political. Judges were meant to interpret law, not reshape society according to theory, grievance, or political fashion. Once that line is crossed, the rule of law stops being law and becomes power wearing a robe.
History is clear on this point. Revolutions do not begin with tanks. They begin with courts. Authoritarian and communist systems do not seize legitimacy by force alone. They co-opt the judiciary, hollow it out from within, and convert legal interpretation into ideological enforcement. When courts stop serving as neutral arbiters, every other institution becomes downstream of politics.
This is not about left versus right. It is about whether law exists independently of ideology. A judiciary that views itself as an engine for social transformation rather than a constraint on power is incompatible with constitutional government. When judges believe outcomes matter more than process, precedent becomes optional and rights become conditional.
If this continues unchecked, we are not talking about a single bad ruling or even a bad decade. We are talking about the erosion of a legal tradition that has sustained one of the longest running constitutional systems in human history.
Courts are meant to protect the republic from ideology, not advance it.
Republicans in Congress, please grow a spine.
Elon Musk: There's so much fraud that it's basically just a question of what to prosecute first.
“Because it's such a long list, you have to actually prioritize lists. We convey the list to the Department of Justice. DOJ has a process that they go through to review and think about it. The wheels of justice turn slowly. Obviously I've got a maniacal sense of urgency. So to me, when I see that terrible fraud has happened, I'm like, why haven't we arrested someone already? But as the saying goes, the wheels of justice turn slowly but surely. And I think probably the person that stole 400,000 Social Security numbers, at least, maybe more will be arrested hopefully this week.
And with respect to the non governmental organizations, these sort of fake NGOs, I think there needs to be a number of arrests in that regard as well because these are fake charities where mostly Democrats almost. And I want to be clear, there's sometimes a little bit of Republican in there because they sometimes throw the Republicans a bone to say, hey, be quiet about this. So that's where you start getting the uniparty thing going on. But it is overwhelmingly the Democrats and they give these billions of dollars to NGOs run by Democrats that then go through a giant money laundering scheme. Really at this point, I think the word NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous.”
Interview Fox News The Five, March 31, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment